Salupo v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that it is appropriate to deny leave to amend “when a party has been given ample prior opportunity to allege a claim”
• holding that denial of a motion to amend the complaint was not an abuse of discretion where plaintiffs had four prior opportunities to plead their claims and failed to do so
• dismissing RICO claims where pleadings were \devoid of any specific facts or circumstances\
• \A complaint which consists of conclusory allegations unsupported by factual assertions fails even the liberal standard of Rule 12(b)(6).\ (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)
• dismissal with prejudice is proper when “a party has been given ample prior opportunity to allege a claim’
• \A complaint which consists of conclusory allegations unsupported by factual assertions fails even the liberal standard of Rule 12(b)(6).\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).