Saltzgiver v. McGrath

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming a disgorgement order where the plaintiffs “have shown no injury to themselves, no diversion of sales from them to the appellants, no direct competition from which injury may be inferable, and no palming off or fraudulent conduct”
• “[I]f there is no competition, there can be no diversion of customers.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).