· 10/10/1940
Salter v. Toohey
Citations
- 125 N.J.L. 366
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding expert cannot be qualified to testify as to general or specific causation because he is not a medical doctor and he cannot testify that the silicone gel caused plaintiff’s diseases
- citing, among authority, Legg v. Chopra, 286 F.3d 286, 289 (6th Cir. 2002)
- “Exclusion of expert testimony may result in the entry of summary judgment and is reviewed on appeal for abuse of discretion.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.