Skip to main content
· 10/10/1940

Salter v. Toohey

Citations

  • 125 N.J.L. 366

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding expert cannot be qualified to testify as to general or specific causation because he is not a medical doctor and he cannot testify that the silicone gel caused plaintiff’s diseases
  • citing, among authority, Legg v. Chopra, 286 F.3d 286, 289 (6th Cir. 2002)
  • “Exclusion of expert testimony may result in the entry of summary judgment and is reviewed on appeal for abuse of discretion.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.