Skip to main content

Salter v. State

Citations

  • 159 Tex. Crim. 482
  • 264 S.W.2d 719
  • 1953 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1915

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that testimony that appellant was drinking at time of collision and was suffering from delirium did not require court to charge jury to acquit defendant if defendant was incapable of distinguishing between right and wrong
  • holding that testimony that appellant was drinking at time of collision and was suffering from delirium did not require court to charge jury to acquit defendant if defendant was incapable of distinguishing between right and wrong
  • holding that testimony that appellant was drinking at time of collision and was suffering from delirium did not require court to charge jury to acquit defendant if defendant was incapable of distinguishing between right and wrong
  • holding that testimony that appellant was drinking at time of collision and was suffering from delirium did not require court to charge jury to acquit defendant if defendant was incapable of distinguishing between right and wrong

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Woodley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.