Salt River Valley Water Users' Ass'n v. Peoria Ginning Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• examining statutory and constitutional signature requirements as well as the purpose behind those requirements
• finding substantial compliance when more signatures were included on petitions than allowed by statute; some addresses were written by someone other than the signer or indicated only by ditto marks; and circulators did not include their cities and state, but did include their addresses
• absence of circulator's certificate \requires that the names should be stricken in the absence of affirmative evidence that those signing were qualified electors.\
• absence of circulator’s certificate “requires that the names should be stricken in the absence of affirmative evidence that those signing were qualified electors.”
• overruled with respect to another point only in Renck v. Superior Court, 66 Ariz. 320, 187 P.2d 656 (1947)
• overruled with respect to another point only in Renck v. Superior Court, 66 Ariz. 320, 187 P.2d 656 (1947)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).