· 2/9/1993
Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement & Power District v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.
Citations
- 861 P.2d 668
- 176 Ariz. 383
- 132 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 44
- 1993 Ariz. App. LEXIS 25
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- addressing constitutionality of erroneous instruction under Article 18, § 5 even though jury returned general verdict for the defense and could have found for prevailing party on basis not affected by the error
- permissive instructions “leave the plaintiff’s recovery to the discretion of the jury.”
- “Whe[n] an erroneous instruction has been given on the law, and a correct instruction might have produced a different result, the error is not cured by the fact that the jury might have found for the prevailing party on some basis unaffected by the error.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Druke, Hathaway, Espinosa
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.