Skip to main content
· 7/27/1979

Salt Lake County v. Murray City Redevelopment

Citations

  • 598 P.2d 1339
  • 1979 Utah LEXIS 862

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that procedural preconditions are “jurisdictional, and may not be disregarded,” and not conducting prejudice analysis (cleaned up)
  • noting that courts “must remain sensitive to the need for [s]trict compliance with . . . statute[s] concerning notice . . . in order to protect private property rights, which are of fundamental importance”
  • relying on Tribe for the proposition that fighting urban blight by means of redevelopment plans is a state rather than a municipal function
  • \Statutes conferring the power of condemnation under the right of eminent domain are strictly construed.\
  • \Statutes conferring the power of condemnation under the right of eminent do main are strictly construed.\
  • \`Statutes conferring the power of condemnation under the right of eminent domain are strictly construed.'\ (quoting Tremonton v. Johnston, 49 Utah 307, 164 P. 190, 191 (1917))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wilkins, Crockett, Maughan, Hall, Stewart

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.