· 7/27/1979
Salt Lake County v. Murray City Redevelopment
Citations
- 598 P.2d 1339
- 1979 Utah LEXIS 862
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that procedural preconditions are “jurisdictional, and may not be disregarded,” and not conducting prejudice analysis (cleaned up)
- noting that courts “must remain sensitive to the need for [s]trict compliance with . . . statute[s] concerning notice . . . in order to protect private property rights, which are of fundamental importance”
- relying on Tribe for the proposition that fighting urban blight by means of redevelopment plans is a state rather than a municipal function
- \Statutes conferring the power of condemnation under the right of eminent domain are strictly construed.\
- \Statutes conferring the power of condemnation under the right of eminent do main are strictly construed.\
- \`Statutes conferring the power of condemnation under the right of eminent domain are strictly construed.'\ (quoting Tremonton v. Johnston, 49 Utah 307, 164 P. 190, 191 (1917))
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Wilkins, Crockett, Maughan, Hall, Stewart
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.