Skip to main content
· 12/5/1995

Salt Lake City v. Silver Fork Pipeline Corp.

Citations

  • 913 P.2d 731
  • 279 Utah Adv. Rep. 3
  • 1995 Utah LEXIS 82
  • 1995 WL 714823

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that issue preclusion applies “even though the underlying claims . . . may be different”
  • stating that there must be final judgment on merits before doctrine of res judicata is applicable
  • stating that there must be final judgment on merits before doctrine of res judicata is applicable
  • “A trial court’s decision to grant or deny a motion for summary judgment is a legal one and will be reviewed for correctness.”
  • \A trial court's decision to grant or deny a motion for summary judgment is a legal one and will be reviewed for correctness.\
  • “Claim preclusion prevents parties or their privies from relitigating a claim for relief that was once litigated on the merits and resulted in a final judgment between the same parties or (continued...

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Durham, Zimmerman, Stewart, Howe, Russon, Durham'S

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.