Skip to main content
· 10/12/1983

Salt Lake City Corp. v. Confer

Citations

  • 674 P.2d 632
  • 37 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 283
  • 1 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 504
  • 1983 Utah LEXIS 1191
  • 33 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 34,284

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “one particular job for one particular employee cannot be a, ‘major life activity’ ”
  • ‘one particular job for one particular employer cannot be a “major life activity” ’ (emphasis in original)
  • “one particular job for one particular employer cannot be a ‘major life activity.’ ”
  • “one particular job for one particular employer cannot be a ‘major life activity’ ”
  • perceived impairment could violate the Utah Anti-Discrimination Act [Utah Code Ann 34-35-1 et seq.] — the act defines \handicap” as \a physical or mental impairment which substantially limits one or more of a person’s major life activities,” Utah Code Ann 34-35-2[9]
  • Industrial Commission’s interpretation of “impairment”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Oaks, Hall, Stewart, Howe, Durham

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.