Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
Illinois Supreme Court· 12/3/2001

Salsitz v. Kreiss

Citations

  • 761 N.E.2d 724
  • 198 Ill. 2d 1
  • 260 Ill. Dec. 541

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting a circuit court’s order compelling arbitration is injunctive in nature and thus subject to interlocutory appeal under Rule 307(a)(1)
  • noting a circuit court’s order compelling arbitration is injunctive in nature and thus subject to interlocutory appeal under Rule 307(a)(1)
  • noting a circuit court’s order compelling arbitration -6- is injunctive in nature and thus subject to interlocutory appeal under Rule 307(a)(1)
  • rejecting argument that Supreme Court Rule 307 mandates an interlocutory appeal, noting that the word “may” signals an option and not a requirement, and did not preclude a litigant from seeking review of an interlocutory order after final judgment
  • an order denying a motion to compel arbitration is injunctive in nature and therefore appealable under Rule 307(a)(1)
  • “order of the circuit court to compel or stay arbitration is injunctive in nature and subject to interlocutory appeal under paragraph (a)(1) of the rule”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Freeman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

84 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

30 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Salsitz v. Kreiss

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.