Salsitz v. Kreiss

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting a circuit court’s order compelling arbitration is injunctive in nature and thus subject to interlocutory appeal under Rule 307(a)(1)
• noting a circuit court’s order compelling arbitration is injunctive in nature and thus subject to interlocutory appeal under Rule 307(a)(1)
• noting a circuit court’s order compelling arbitration -6- is injunctive in nature and thus subject to interlocutory appeal under Rule 307(a)(1)
• rejecting argument that Supreme Court Rule 307 mandates an interlocutory appeal, noting that the word “may” signals an option and not a requirement, and did not preclude a litigant from seeking review of an interlocutory order after final judgment
• an order denying a motion to compel arbitration is injunctive in nature and therefore appealable under Rule 307(a)(1)
• “order of the circuit court to compel or stay arbitration is injunctive in nature and subject to interlocutory appeal under paragraph (a)(1) of the rule”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).