Salmon v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the record of trial court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law was insufficient to show whether the court considered the required factors in determining whether a forfeiture was an excessive fine
• holding that the record of trial court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law was insufficient to show whether the court considered the required factors in determining whether a forfeiture was an excessive fine

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Buchanan v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2013-01-15· cited 8×
• Tipton v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2013-05-22· cited 4×
• Beauchamp v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2002-12-13· cited 2×
• Mikell v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2014-11-20
• James Buchanan v. State of Georgia
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2013-01-15
• Anna D. Tipton v. State of Georgia
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2013-05-22
• Ricky Mikell v. State of Georgia, Ex Rel, Richard A. Mallard, District Attorney, Ogeechee Judicial Circuit of Ga
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2014-11-20

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Thorp v. State of Ga.
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1994-12-05· cited 43×
• Mitchell v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1999-02-09· cited 21×
• Gearin v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1995-08-23· cited 17×
• Shook v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1996-04-15· cited 11×
• Evans v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1995-06-21· cited 10×
• Thorp v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1995-04-12· cited 9×