Skip to main content
· 11/30/1994

Salman v. Newell

Citations

  • 885 P.2d 607
  • 110 Nev. 1333
  • 1994 Nev. LEXIS 145

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • observing that no statute or rule permits a nonlawyer to represent an entity and concluding that an entity cannot proceed in proper person
  • observing that no statute or rule permits a nonlawyer to represent an entity and concluding that an entity cannot proceed in proper person
  • observing that no statute or rule permits a non-lawyer to represent an entity and concluding that an entity cannot proceed in proper person
  • observing that no statute or rule permits a nonlawyer to represent an entity and concluding that an entity cannot proceed in proper person
  • observing that no statute or rule permits a nonlawyer to represent an entity and concluding that an entity cannot proceed in proper person
  • dismissing appeal because, even assuming company was a trust and pro-se person was trustee, nonlawyer trustee had no authority to represent another in court

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.