· 11/30/1994
Salman v. Newell
Citations
- 885 P.2d 607
- 110 Nev. 1333
- 1994 Nev. LEXIS 145
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- observing that no statute or rule permits a nonlawyer to represent an entity and concluding that an entity cannot proceed in proper person
- observing that no statute or rule permits a nonlawyer to represent an entity and concluding that an entity cannot proceed in proper person
- observing that no statute or rule permits a non-lawyer to represent an entity and concluding that an entity cannot proceed in proper person
- observing that no statute or rule permits a nonlawyer to represent an entity and concluding that an entity cannot proceed in proper person
- observing that no statute or rule permits a nonlawyer to represent an entity and concluding that an entity cannot proceed in proper person
- dismissing appeal because, even assuming company was a trust and pro-se person was trustee, nonlawyer trustee had no authority to represent another in court
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Per Curiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.