Skip to main content
· 3/30/2011

Sally Randall v. Rolls-Royce Corpor

Citations

  • 637 F.3d 818
  • 79 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 84
  • 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 6488
  • 111 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1565
  • 2011 WL 1163882

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “named plaintiffs who are subject to a defense that would not defeat unnamed class members are not adequate class representative, and adequacy of representation is one of the requirements for class certification”
  • “[N]amed plaintiffs who are subject to a defense that would not defeat unnamed class members are not adequate class representatives, and adequacy of representation is one of the requirements for class certification.”
  • Rule 23(b)(2) is applicable “only when the primary relief sought is injunctive”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Posner, Flaum, Sykes

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.