Sally Naeem v. McKesson Drug Company and Dan Montreuil

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a manager’s extreme demands on a pregnant employee could support an ITED claim
• recognizing that a damages award will not be subject to remittitur if it “falls within the flexible range of conclusions which can be reasonably supported by facts.”
• recognizing that a damages award will not be subject to remittitur if it \falls within the flexible range of conclusions which can be reasonably supported by facts.\
• noting that it was permissible for a jury to consider that the plaintiff was pregnant and upholding the damages awarded to her for an IIED claim
• holding expert testimony inadmissible where it “appeared to be general observations regarding what is normal or usual business practice” and was “not tied to specific portions” of the other evidence in the case
• finding improperly admitted expert testimony did not affect substantial rights because certain of the expert’s objectionable statements were “corroborated by other witnesses”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).