Sally Gee, Inc. v. Myra Hogan, Inc., Myra Hogan and Sally Lee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• listing as examples of diluting trade names: “Dupont shoes, Buick aspirin, Schlitz varnish, Kodak Pianos [and] Bulova gowns”
• plaintiff had not and could not prove tamishment of its products given defendant’s higher quality products
• “The interest protected by [the New York antidilution statute] is ... the selling power that a distinctive mark or name with favorable associations has engendered for a product in the mind of the consuming public.”
• “Sally Gee” and “Sally Lee”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).