Sally Conforte v. United States of America

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that a plaintiff “may not bring [an] action against the United States under 26 U.S.C. § 7433 without exhausting . . . administrative remedies”
• explaining that a plaintiff “may not bring [an] action against the United States under 26 U.S.C. § 7433 without exhausting . . . administrative remedies”
• finding that requirement to 5 exhaust administrative remedies is jurisdictional
• failure to exhaust administrative remedies under 26 U.S.C. § 7433(d)(1) deprives the court of jurisdiction
• district court lacked jurisdiction to hear action under § 7433 12 without exhaustion of administrative remedies
• district court lacked jurisdiction to hear action under 26 U.S.C. § 7433 because 25 plaintiff failed to exhaust her administrative remedies

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).