· 12/9/1996
Salley v. Central Arkansas Transit Authority
Citations
- 326 Ark. 804
- 934 S.W.2d 510
- 1996 Ark. LEXIS 669
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- reversing convictions that were supported by evidence seized in unlawful search, for which trial court erroneously denied defendant’s motion to suppress
- an exigent circumstance generally \is the officer's reasonable belief that such action is a necessary response on his part to an emergency situation\
- because officers were not authorized to enter defendant’s back yard, observations made from back yard could not support search
- because officers were not authorized to enter defendant’s backyard, observations made from backyard could not support search
- an exigent circumstance generally “is the officer’s reasonable belief that such action is a necessary response on his part to an emergency situation”
- an exigent circumstance generally “is the officer’s reasonable belief that such action is a necessary response on his part to an emergency situation”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Glaze
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.