Skip to main content
· 12/9/1996

Salley v. Central Arkansas Transit Authority

Citations

  • 326 Ark. 804
  • 934 S.W.2d 510
  • 1996 Ark. LEXIS 669

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reversing convictions that were supported by evidence seized in unlawful search, for which trial court erroneously denied defendant’s motion to suppress
  • an exigent circumstance generally \is the officer's reasonable belief that such action is a necessary response on his part to an emergency situation\
  • because officers were not authorized to enter defendant’s back yard, observations made from back yard could not support search
  • because officers were not authorized to enter defendant’s backyard, observations made from backyard could not support search
  • an exigent circumstance generally “is the officer’s reasonable belief that such action is a necessary response on his part to an emergency situation”
  • an exigent circumstance generally “is the officer’s reasonable belief that such action is a necessary response on his part to an emergency situation”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Glaze

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.