Sall Ex Rel. Sall v. T'S, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that golfers relied on the use of an air horn signaling inclem- ent weather to their detriment even in a case where the course had no duty to warn golfers of inclement weather
• applying Second Restatement to claim of failure to perform a duty a party has voluntarily undertaken
• using a particular safety feature that one has no duty to use nevertheless implies a duty of reasonable care to use it correctly
• finding liability where the plaintiff relied on the defendant’s policy of using air horns to signal bad weather
• “ ‘A defendant’s agreement or affirmative act indicating a willingness to provide services is a threshold requirement for such a duty to arise.’ [Citation omitted.]”
• golf course assumed the duty to use a horn to warn its patrons of dangerous thunderstorms, which lightning-strike victim relied on to his detriment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).