Skip to main content
· 10/12/2001

Salisbury v. Purdue Pharma, L.P.

Citations

  • 166 F. Supp. 2d 546
  • 46 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 385
  • 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22307
  • 2001 WL 1262210

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • issue was whether pharmacies were liable for selling OxyContin, a schedule II narcotic drug, and there was no allegation that the pharmacies sold the drug in an altered condition
  • The court found fraudulent joinder of non-diverse defendants due to lack of factual specificity and unique involvement in the matter.
  • “plaintiffs' sole reference to the pharmacy defendants alleges mere inappropriate distribution and recommendation. Such a broad and cursory allegation is a far cry from alleging actual or constructive knowledge, however.”
  • claim for punitive damages “is not a separate cause of action”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hood

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.