· 10/12/2001
Salisbury v. Purdue Pharma, L.P.
Citations
- 166 F. Supp. 2d 546
- 46 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 385
- 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22307
- 2001 WL 1262210
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- issue was whether pharmacies were liable for selling OxyContin, a schedule II narcotic drug, and there was no allegation that the pharmacies sold the drug in an altered condition
- The court found fraudulent joinder of non-diverse defendants due to lack of factual specificity and unique involvement in the matter.
- “plaintiffs' sole reference to the pharmacy defendants alleges mere inappropriate distribution and recommendation. Such a broad and cursory allegation is a far cry from alleging actual or constructive knowledge, however.”
- claim for punitive damages “is not a separate cause of action”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hood
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.