Salisbury v. Majesky

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• construing the meaning of section 10 of the UFTA
• agreeing with Levy’s statutory construction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• GEA Group AG v. Flex-N-Gate Corporation
  Seventh Circuit· 2014-01-10· cited 44×
• Workforce Solutions v. Urban Services of America, Inc.
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2012-08-28· cited 31×
• Schnidt v. HSC, Inc.
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 2014-01-15· cited 25×
• Softcheck v. Imesch
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2006-09-01· cited 19×
• Field v. Trust Estate of Rose Kepoikai (In Re Maui Industrial Loan & Finance Co.)
  D. Hawaii· 2011-05-04· cited 11×
• Zurich American Insurance Co. v. Personnel Staffing Group, LLC
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2018-08-24· cited 5×
• Victor Rosario v. Marco Construction and Management
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2016-01-12· cited 4×
• Pentagon Federal Credit Union v. Poorian
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2024-06-14

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Ogle v. Fuiten
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1984-06-29· cited 129×
• Williams v. Board of Education
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1991-11-25· cited 41×
• Swank v. Department of Revenue
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2003-02-13· cited 38×
• Levy v. Markal Sales Corp.
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2000-02-02· cited 31×
• Gilbert Bros., Inc. v. Gilbert
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1994-03-03· cited 24×
• In re C.M.
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1996-08-14· cited 15×
• In Interest of Cm
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1996-08-14· cited 13×
• Zelenka v. Krone
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1998-02-19· cited 11×