Skip to main content
· 4/13/2001

Salinas v. Skelton

Citations

  • 547 S.E.2d 289
  • 249 Ga. App. 217

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that document had been authenticated circumstantially but going on to address separately whether document was inadmissible hearsay
  • “[A] document can be authenticated by circumstantial evidence. One such circumstance, when coupled with other evidence, is a party’s production of the document during discovery.”
  • party’s production of document during discovery is circumstantial evidence of authentication
  • party’s production of document during discovery is circumstantial evidence of authentication
  • party can make out prima facie case that document is an authentic business record of the opposing party based on production of the document by the opposing party, combined with other circumstantial evidence, such as the appearance and content of the document

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ruffin, Andrews, Ellington

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.