Skip to main content
· 1/18/2002

Salim Oleochemicals v. M/v Shropshire

Citations

  • 278 F.3d 90
  • 2002 A.M.C. 2854
  • 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 878
  • 2002 WL 63739

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that district courts should be mindful of the fact that a dismissal is appealable whereas a stay is not and that “Tujnnecessary delay of the arbitral process through appellate review is disfavored” (cleaned up)
  • urging \district courts in these circumstances to be as clear as possible about whether they truly intend to dismiss an action or mean to grant a stay ... or whether they mean to do something else entirely.\
  • urging “district courts in these circumstances to be as clear as possible about whether they truly intend to dismiss an action or mean to grant a stay . . . or whether they mean to do something else entirely.”
  • urging \district courts in these circumstances to be as clear as possible about whether they truly intend to dismiss an action or mean to grant a stay . . . or whether they mean to do something else entirely.\
  • order compelling arbitration and dismissing without prejudice was an appealable decision under the FAA
  • order compelling arbitration and dismissing without prej- udice was an appealable decision under the FAA

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sack, Sotomayor, Katzmann

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.