Salgado v. County of Los Angeles

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the jury must return a verdict for both present and future values and the trial court's periodic payment schedule must match both the present and future values
• holding that the jury must return a verdict for both present and future values and the trial court’s periodic payment schedule must match both the present and future values
• explaining that the generally accepted practice of discounting future damages “estimate[s] ... the actual amounts that plaintiff would have received” over the years (emphasis added)
• where the jury is instruct ed to determine both future medical damages and the present cash value of that amount, the trial court may not second-guess the Jury's determination and again reduce the Judgment to its present value

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).