Salerno v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that attorney who failed to disclose an engineering report with potential evidentiary value violated the state’s rules of professional conduct
• under two-part test under state law, disqualification of counsel orders, otherwise interlocutory, may be appealable
• attorney was classically aggrieved to bring writ of error challenging trial court’s finding that she had violated Rules of Pro- fessional Conduct
• court initiated disciplinary proceedings against attorney after certain parties informed court, during hearing on application for prejudgment remedy, that attorney had engaged in efforts to suppress and to alter architect’s report
• court initiated disciplinary proceedings against attorney after certain parties informed court, during hearing on application for prejudgment remedy, that attorney had engaged in efforts to suppress and to alter architect’s report
• court need not reach issue unnecessary to resolution of case

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).