Saler v. Irick

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the personal representative, who did not reside in Indiana, had a \compelling\ interest in obtaining relief in Indiana
• holding that in rem jurisdiction was not appro- priate where the annuities at issue were not present in Indiana, even though the decedent’s domicile was Indiana
• holding that it was not unforeseeable that the out-of-state beneficiaries could be haled into an Indiana court to account for their actions in. initiating and pursuing contacts with an Indiana bank
• noting that the facts that the disputed assets originated in Indiana and were transferred in violation of the decedents' will that was being administered in Indiana weighed in favor of Indiana's interest in adjudicating the dispute
• “[N]ew evidence may not be submitted to the court for the first time upon appeal.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).