Saldana v. Federal Bureau of Prisons

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “because [plaintiff] neither reduced the scope of his January 2006 request nor paid, or agreed to pay, the associated search fee, [he] therefore has not exhausted his administrative remedies”
• “because [plaintiff] neither reduced the scope of his January 2006 request nor paid, or agreed to pay, the associated search fee, [he] therefore has not exhausted his administrative remedies”
• “[T]he adequacy of a search is not determined by its results, but by the method of the search itself.” (citing Weisberg v. U.S. Dep’t of Just., 745 F.2d 1476, 1485 (D.C. Cir. 1984))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).