Skip to main content
· 8/2/2000

Salcedo v. Artuz

Citations

  • 107 F. Supp. 2d 405
  • 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11005
  • 2000 WL 1092669

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • mentioning constitutional amendment at issue is sufficient to fairly present the constitutional claim to state courts
  • habeas claim failed where prosecutor did not assert personal opinion as to witness credibility but merely summarized testimony of witnesses and argued that prosecution witnesses were more credible

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Scheindlin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.