Skip to main content

Salazar v. State

Citations

  • 284 S.W.3d 874
  • 2009 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 731
  • 2009 WL 1531956

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that notice element of criminal trespass is implicitly included in burglary of a habitation
  • concluding that notice element of criminal trespass is implicitly included in burglary of a habitation
  • holding that a habitation inherently provides notice that entry is forbidden
  • holding criminal trespass‘s notice-that-entry-was-forbidden element was implicit in burglary of habitation because a habitation implicitly gives notice that entry is forbidden
  • holding criminal trespass’s notice-that-entry-was-forbidden element was implicit in burglary of habitation because a habitation implicitly gives notice that entry is forbidden
  • stating that what makes a structure suitable for overnight accommodation is a complex, subjective fact question for the jury

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Womack, Meyers, Price, Johnson, Keasler, Hervey, Holcomb, Cochran, Keller

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

64 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.