Court of Appeals of Georgia· 6/20/2002
Salazar v. State
Citations
- 567 S.E.2d 706
- 256 Ga. App. 50
- 2002 Fulton County D. Rep. 1972
- 2002 Ga. App. LEXIS 825
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a pro se defendant is not held to a different or more lenient standard merely because he elected to proceed pro se; one who knowingly elects to represent himself assumes full responsibility for complying with the substantive and procedural requirements of the law
- trial court had broad discretion in requiring pro se defendant to comply with rules of evidence and procedure, “ ‘which task appellant willingly undertook when he decided to represent himself’ [cit.]”
- “The trial court . . . engaged in appropriate attempts to require [Taylor] to comply with rules of evidence and procedure, which task [Taylor] willingly undertook when he decided to represent himself.”
- “The trial court . . . engaged in appropriate attempts to require [Taylor] to comply with rules of evidence and procedure, which task [Taylor] willingly undertook when he decided to represent himself.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Smith, Eldridge, Ellington
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
36 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Sevostiyanova v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2012-01-12· cited 31×
- Moore v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2009-11-20· cited 25×
- Williams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2012-11-26· cited 21×
- Slmbey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2007-11-02· cited 20×
- Leone v. GREEN TREE SERVICING, LLCCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2011-08-23· cited 15×
- Grooms v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2003-06-06· cited 12×
- Riggs v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2012-10-31· cited 12×
- Johnson v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2003-04-03· cited 10×
- Gaither v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2011-10-14· cited 10×
- Coffield v. KupermanCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2005-02-07· cited 9×
- Winston v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2004-11-30· cited 9×
- MORMAN-JOHNSON v. HathawayCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2011-10-28· cited 9×
- Anderson v. the StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2015-10-22· cited 9×
- Ferguson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2003-09-03· cited 8×
- In the Interest of B. D. S.Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2004-08-11· cited 8×
- Orange v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2013-01-07· cited 8×
- Taylor v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2014-07-07· cited 7×
- Lewis v. the StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2015-02-18· cited 6×
- May v. S.E. GA Ford, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2018-02-08· cited 6×
- Govindasamy v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2011-07-22· cited 5×
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court· 1979-10-01· cited 79,490×
- Cook v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1999-03-19· cited 75×
- Wilson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1987-09-09· cited 30×
- Tibbs v. TibbsSupreme Court of Georgia· 1987-09-09· cited 29×
- Gilbert v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1993-03-17· cited 26×
- Anthony v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1999-02-05· cited 23×
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1999-01-21· cited 17×
- Smith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2001-07-16· cited 10×
- Carter v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1998-02-27· cited 7×
- Keenum v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2001-02-20· cited 6×
- Quinn v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2002-02-01· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.