Salazar v. Citadel Communications Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that an arbitration agreement “annexed” to an employee handbook was an unenforceable illusory promise because the employer reserved the right to modify any provision of the handbook
• stating that “courts look to general state contract law’.’ to decide legal questions concerning arbitration agreements
• stating that “courts look to general state contract law” to decide legal questions concerning arbitration agreements
• explaining that an employee handbook which gave an employer a unilateral right to modify any handbook provision, with no limitations, is an illusory and unenforceable promise
• noting “the rule, oft-repeated in this state, that we construe ambiguous adhesion contracts against the drafter”
• employee supposedly obligated to arbitrate, but employer not obligated to do so; arbitration agreement held illusory

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).