SALAZAR

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “If ... a possible ground of excludability develops, it is proper for the ground to be ruled upon by the immigration judge, as long as the applicant is informed of the issues confronting him at some point in the hearing, and he is given a reasonable opportunity to meet them.”
• colorable claim to lawful permanent resident status
• “If . . . a possible ground of excludability develops, it is proper for the ground to be ruled upon by the immigration judge, as long as the applicant is informed of the issues confronting him at some point in the hearing, and he is given a reasonable opportunity to meet them.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Landon v. Plasencia
  Supreme Court· 1982-11-15· cited 890×
• Matovski v. Gonzales
  Sixth Circuit· 2007-06-15· cited 47×
• TIJAM
  Board of Immigration Appeals· 1998-07-01· cited 36×
• MATELOT
  Board of Immigration Appeals· 1982-07-01· cited 7×
• Malonda v. Mukasey
  First Circuit· 2008-07-14· cited 3×

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Rosenberg v. Fleuti
  Supreme Court· 1963-06-17· cited 410×
• Ponciano Maldonado-Sandoval v. United States Immigration and Naturalization Service
  Ninth Circuit· 1975-05-19· cited 31×
• KANE
  Board of Immigration Appeals· 1975-07-01· cited 22×