Salaris v. Jamaica Hospital

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that a movant “must meet the heavy burden of showing that if proceedings before the immigration likely change the result in the case”
• holding that proffered evidence 11 must be material and must support prima facie case for 12 asylum
• holding that “incremental or incidental” change does not satisfy the requirements for a late motion to reopen based on changed country conditions
• holding that new report or law is not evidence of changed conditions without convincing evidence that prior version of law was different, or was differently enforced, in some relevant and material way
• holding that in evaluating evidence of changed country conditions, the BIA “compare[s] the evidence of country conditions submitted with the motion to those that existed at the time of the merits hearing below”
• holding that in evaluating evidence of changed country conditions, the BIA “compare[s] the evidence of country conditions submitted with the motion to those that existed at the time of the merits hearing below”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).