Salamea v. MacY's East, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding unpaid wage claim preempted where “the CBA contain[ed] detailed requirements for an employee to be eligible for vacation benefits” and a dispute about employee’s entitlement to vacation days would “require interpretation of the CBA”
• finding plaintiffs claim for vacation pay pursuant to N.Y. Labor Law was preempted, because the claim required the court to determine if plaintiff had “followed the appropriate [CBA] procedures ... to make her eligible for vacation pay”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).