Skip to main content
· 8/31/1989

Sakowitz, Inc. v. Chase Bank International (In Re Sakowitz, Inc.)

Citations

  • 110 B.R. 268
  • 1989 Bankr. LEXIS 2584
  • 1989 WL 167635

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • applying the doctrine of espresso unius est exclusio alterius (a maxim of statutory interpretation meaning that the expression of one thing is the exclusion of another) to reach the same conclusion
  • § 506(b) applies to oversecured claims for attorney's fees regardless of whether the fees were incurred before or after the filing of the bankruptcy petition
  • \This Court is further of the opinion that attorney fees should be allowed where the Debtor is solvent (before and after the allowance) due to policy considerations akin to those with respect to the allowance of interest post-petition.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wheless

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.