Sakovits v. Sakovits

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a previously emancipated child should not 8 A-0596-13T1 \forever . . . be estopped from seeking . . . contribution from his parents\ towards beginning or resuming his education
• duty to assure the necessary support for the education of a child over the age of eighteen
• court declined to order father to pay school expenses of 22-year-old son because son waited four years to begin college, had accepted $3,200 from father to start a business, and father had relied on son's expressed intent not to go to college in structuring his finances

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).