Sako v. Taylor

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a statute providing that the Secretary \shall furnish hospital care\ plainly establishes a mandatory obligation to provide hospital care
• explaining that Secretary’s authority to grant equitable relief under section 503 is wholly within Secretary’s discretion and Court lacks jurisdiction to review exercise of Secretary’s equity discretion
• explaining that Secretary's authority to grant equitable relief under section 503 is wholly within Secretary's discretion and Court lacks jurisdiction to review exercise of Secretary's equity discretion
• explaining that Secretary’s authority to grant equitable relief under section 503 is wholly within Secretary’s discretion and that Court lacks jurisdiction to review exercise of Secretary’s equity discretion
• noting that Notice of Appellate Rights is required by 38 C.F.R. § 3.103(b)
• “ ‘a more specific statute will be given precedence over a more general one ....’” (quoting Busic v. United States, 446 U.S. 398, 406, 100 S.Ct. 1747, 64 L.Ed.2d 381 (1980))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).