Skip to main content
· 7/1/2009

Sakil v. State

Citations

  • 287 S.W.3d 23
  • 2009 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 879
  • 2009 WL 1911919

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “If there was no error, we need not pursue a harm analysis.”
  • “But what criteria qualify a statement of law as being ‘applicable to the case’? Some information, such as the elements of the charged offense, must appear in the jury charge and is without question ‘the law applicable to the case.’ But a Section 8.04(a

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Meyers

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.