Sakelaris v. Rice/Maddox Partnership

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that plaintiffs could not establish the reasonable reliance element for a promissory estoppel claim because reliance on a promise consisting solely of at-will employment is unreasonable as a matter of law
• holding that plaintiffs could not establish the reasonable reliance element for their promissory estoppel claim arising out of their employment because reliance on a promise consisting solely of at-will employment is unreasonable as a matter of law
• under South Carolina law, \[r]eliance on a promise consisting solely of at-will employment is unreasonable as a matter of law\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).