Sakai v. Kelley
Citations
- 66 Wash. 172
- 119 P. 190
Syllabus
<p>Judgment— Vacation — Jurisdiction — Affidavit of Merits. A motion to vacate a judgment void for want of jurisdiction need not be supported by an affidavit of merits.</p> <p>Appeal — Record—Statement of Pacts — Affidavits. An appeal from an order denying a motion to vacate a default judgment, winch, appears to have been hea'rd on affidavits, will be dismissed where the affidavits were not brought up by a bill of exceptions or statement of facts; and it is not sufficient that the defendant’s affidavit was attached to and made a part 'of the motion, where the transcript shows that there was at least one other counter affidavit considered.</p> <p>Appeal — Review— Correct Decision on Incorrect Ground. Where the record on appeal is insufficient to secure a review of an order denying the vacation of a judgment, error cannot be predicated on the fact that the order recited an insufficient legal reason for denying the motion.</p>
Judges: Chadwick
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
11 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Chehalis Coal Co. v. LaisureWashington Supreme Court· 1917-07-25· cited 30×
- Mattson v. Eureka Cedar Lumber & Shingle Co.Washington Supreme Court· 1914-04-27· cited 27×
- Hayworth v. McDonaldWashington Supreme Court· 1912-03-18· cited 18×
- International Development Co. v. SangerWashington Supreme Court· 1913-09-29· cited 17×
- Thurman v. KildallWashington Supreme Court· 1914-06-30· cited 14×
- Powers v. Washington Portland Cement Co.Washington Supreme Court· 1914-03-27· cited 12×
- Congdon v. AumillerWashington Supreme Court· 1914-05-16· cited 12×
- Stern v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court· 1913-04-18· cited 11×
- Kelley v. SakaiWashington Supreme Court· 1913-03-06· cited 5×
- State v. RiceWashington Supreme Court· 1913-02-13· cited 3×
- Siegley v. NakataWashington Supreme Court· 1918-04-10
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. VanceWashington Supreme Court· 1902-08-26· cited 83×
- Spoar v. Turn-VereinWashington Supreme Court· 1911-07-15· cited 20×
- F. Chevalier & Co. v. WilsonWashington Supreme Court· 1902-10-18· cited 17×
- Lushington v. Seattle Auto & Driving ClubWashington Supreme Court· 1910-11-22· cited 16×
- Hole v. PageWashington Supreme Court· 1898-11-22· cited 12×
- State v. Lee Wing WahWashington Supreme Court· 1909-05-26· cited 12×
- Richardson v. RichardsonWashington Supreme Court· 1906-09-11· cited 8×
- Gray v. GrangerWashington Supreme Court· 1908-02-11· cited 8×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.