Skip to main content
· 5/30/1997

Saint Mary Home, Inc. v. Service Employees International Union, District 1199 New England Health Care Employees Union, Afl-Cio

Citations

  • 116 F.3d 41
  • 155 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2456
  • 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 15015
  • 1997 WL 340544

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “When parties to an agreement bargain for an arbitrator’s decision, that bargain may not be upset by a court simply because it deems the decision incorrect”
  • “[C]ourts may refuse to enforce arbitral awards only in those rare cases when enforcement of the award would be directly at odds with a well defined and dominant public policy resting on clear law and legal precedent.”
  • “Internal inconsistencies in the opinion are not grounds to vacate the award notwithstanding [appellant’s] plausible argument that the arbitrator’s decision was misguided or our own concerns regarding the arbitrator’s conclusion.”
  • ‘‘[n]owhere does the [employer] point to an established policy that calls for a fixed disciplinary action of permanent dismissal in all cases [in which] drug related conduct occurs in the workplace’’
  • “Internal inconsistencies in the opinion are not grounds to vacate the award notwithstanding the [petitioner’s] plausible argument that the arbitrator’s decision was misguided or our own concerns regarding the arbitrator’s conclusion.”
  • arbitral remedy of reinstatement upheld unless there exists a public policy against reinstatement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Walker, McLaughlin, Cudahy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.