Saint Gobain Autover USA, Inc. v. Xinyi Glass North America, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Ordinarily, the mere existence of competing expert opinion dispels resolution by summary judgment”
• “The party requesting exclusion under Rule 37(c)(1) need not show prejudice, (1) the surprise to the party against whom the evidence would be offered; (2) the ability of that party to cure the surprise; (3

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).