Sain v. R. Abramson Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the trial court erred by granting summary judgment to a motel after the plaintiff fell on a wet spot on the floor because “[t]he evidence . . . did not establish a static condition readily discernible by the plaintiff.”
• slimy, dark, thick substance on hotel floor was not a static condition because there was no evidence that floor always appeared slimy or that person traversing area should have noticed substance
• “At its root, the issue ... is whether taking into account all the circumstances existing at the time and place of [the plaintiff’s] fall, [the plaintiff] exercised the prudence the ordinarily careful person would use in a like situation.”
• “At its root, the issue . . . is whether taking into account all the circumstances existing at the time and place of [the plaintiff’s] fall, [the plaintiff] exercised the prudence the ordinarily careful person would use in a like situation.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).