Skip to main content
· 7/25/1932

Sailors Bros. Co. v. Commissioner

Citations

  • 26 B.T.A. 700
  • 1932 BTA LEXIS 1268

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • requiring party asserting collateral estoppel to prove four elements, including that the identical issue was already presented in an earlier proceeding and ended with a judgment on the merits
  • “[D]isparity of relief may be so great that a party would be unlikely to have vigorously litigated the crucial issues in the first forum and so it would be unfair to preclude relitigation of the issues in a second forum.”
  • setting forth elements of collateral estoppel under Washington law
  • setting forth elements of issue preclusion under Washington law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Well

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.