· 7/25/1932
Sailors Bros. Co. v. Commissioner
Citations
- 26 B.T.A. 700
- 1932 BTA LEXIS 1268
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- requiring party asserting collateral estoppel to prove four elements, including that the identical issue was already presented in an earlier proceeding and ended with a judgment on the merits
- “[D]isparity of relief may be so great that a party would be unlikely to have vigorously litigated the crucial issues in the first forum and so it would be unfair to preclude relitigation of the issues in a second forum.”
- setting forth elements of collateral estoppel under Washington law
- setting forth elements of issue preclusion under Washington law
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Well
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.