Skip to main content
· 8/1/1972

Sailes v. Jones

Citations

  • 499 P.2d 721
  • 17 Ariz. App. 593
  • 1972 Ariz. App. LEXIS 761

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that a court applies quasi estoppel when “the conscience of the court is repelled by the assertion of rights inconsistent with a litigant’s past conduct”
  • “We are in agreement with the cases which have defined ‘parent’ to mean ‘one who begets offspring.’”
  • “The doctrine of [q]uasi estoppel is based on . . . acceptance of benefits;” “In [q]uasi estoppel reliance by the party invoking the principle is not required.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Jacobson, Haire, Eubank

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.