Skip to main content
· 12/14/1970

Sailer v. Leger

Citations

  • 400 U.S. 956
  • 91 S. Ct. 355

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that “Rule 59(e) . . . is not controlled by the same exacting substantive requirements” as Rule 60(b), and that “Rule 59(e) is not subject to the limitations of Rule 60(b)”
  • adopting a similar multi-factor test in regard to Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e)
  • “The Federal Rules do not recognize a ‘motion for reconsideration’ in haec verba.”
  • “The Federal Rules do not recognize a ‘motion for reconsideration’ in haec verba.”
  • “The Federal Rules do not recognize a ‘motion for reconsideration’ in haec verba.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.