· 4/18/2012
SAIF Corporation v. Miguez
Citations
- 277 P.3d 601
- 249 Or. App. 388
- 2012 WL 1332265
- 2012 Ore. App. LEXIS 472
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- the ARU did not interpret a rule by simply applying it to facts without any explanation
- an agency order that simply applied the rule to the facts did not, in the context of that case, \include any rule interpretation\ that we could \assess for plausibility\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ortega, Sercombe, Hadlock
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.