Skip to main content
· 4/18/2012

SAIF Corporation v. Miguez

Citations

  • 277 P.3d 601
  • 249 Or. App. 388
  • 2012 WL 1332265
  • 2012 Ore. App. LEXIS 472

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • the ARU did not interpret a rule by simply applying it to facts without any explanation
  • an agency order that simply applied the rule to the facts did not, in the context of that case, \include any rule interpretation\ that we could \assess for plausibility\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ortega, Sercombe, Hadlock

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.