SAIF Corp. v. Pepperling

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “In reviewing the board’s evaluation of [a medical expert’s] opinion, we do not substitute our judgment for that of the board [.]”
• “In reviewing the board’s evaluation of [an expert’s] opinion, we do not substitute our judgment for that of the board; rather, we determine whether the board’s evaluation of that evidence was reasonable.”
• “In reviewing the board’s evaluation of [an expert’s] opinion, we do not substitute our judgment for that of the board; rather, we determine whether the board’s evaluation of that evidence was reasonable.”
• “In reviewing the board’s evaluation of [an expert’s] opinion, we do not substitute our judgment for that of the board; rather, we determine whether the board’s evaluation of that evidence was reasonable.” (Citation omitted.)
• “In reviewing the board’s evaluation of [an expert’s] opinion we do not substitute our judgment for that of the board; rather, we determine whether the board’s evaluation of that evidence was reasonable(Citation omitted; emphasis added.)
• “In reviewing the board’s evaluation of [an expert’s] opinion, we do not substitute our judgment for that of the board; rather, we determine whether the board’s evaluation of that evidence was reasonable.” (Citation omitted; emphasis added.)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).