Saif Corp. v. Glubrecht

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that structural modifications to the claimant’s home constituted “prosthetic appliances, braces and supports” because they were “an extension of the wheelchair itself, without which the wheelchair could not serve as the tool it is intended to serve”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).