· 3/20/2003
Saichek v. Lupa
Citations
- 787 N.E.2d 827
- 204 Ill. 2d 127
- 272 Ill. Dec. 641
- 2003 Ill. LEXIS 458
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Having once been awarded damages for the [indivisible] injuries ... [, a plaintiff] cannot seek compensation for those injuries again.”
- “Having once been awarded damages for the [indivisible] injuries . . . [, a plaintiff] cannot seek compensation for those injuries again.”
- “[T]here may not be more than one recovery of damages for a single, indivisible injury.”
- after plaintiff received a final judgment, she could not pursue an alternate theory of recovery for the same injury
- after plaintiff received a final judgment, she could not pursue an alternate theory of recovery for the same injury
- “[T]here may not be more than one recovery of damages for a single, indivisible injury.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Rarick
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.