Sagi v. Harkkila

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that our case law allowing Rule 60(b) relief to retrigger appeal rights was rendered “obsolete and inapplicable” to lack-of-notice cases “by the 1991 addition of Rule 4(a)(6)”
• “Rule 4(a) and Rule 77(d) now form a tessellated scheme; they leave no gaps for Rule 60(b) to fill.”
• “[I]t had long been the burden of the party to ascertain when the judgment or order was entered, even if the notice of entry was not sent or was not received.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).